4 to submit a report to the judge, according to the joint statement. The town will have until July 21 to formally respond to Young’s lawsuit and then both sides will meet by Aug. As such, there remains a live controversy between the parties that requires this court’s attention,” Wednesday’s statement said. “The town articulated that it continued to view the painted panels affixed to a portion of the Leavitt’s facade as a ‘sign’ prohibited by the sign code. The local newspaper suggested the residents generally liked the painting, but that the proposed definition changes “would only further complicate enforcement.” But that failed to pass in town elections in April.

The painting could stay right where it is if it showed actual mountains, instead of pastries suggesting mountains, or if the building wasn’t a bakery.īoth sides agreed in February to pause court proceedings - and any potential fines or charges - pending a vote on a revised sign code definition that would allow the painting to stay.

County donuts download